Part II: Laurier

Absolutely agree with Smurf, in the second clearance, the skin reaction is considerably lower than in the first one, provided that treatment starts with a large percentage of hairs on the surface (maximum possible).

The first photo was made just 3 ½ months after first clearance on the fingers (naked needle, January 2011) and just a few minutes after second clearance (insulated needle, April 2011).

The second picture is before the third clearance (July 2011).

The third picture is immediately after 3rd clearance.
The results of the last session will can be seen in a couple of months.

Laurier insulated needle was used in the two past clearances, April and July.

A very impressive difference.

Is that my hand?

It must be - judging from the dates and I’ve just noticed a scar on my left hand from that scab! Woooow, does it look like wrinkly elephant skin!

I love the results on my fingers more than anywhere else. I’ll take pictures of them tomorrow to show what the skin/scabbing looks like (and my arms too).

Yes, Smurf, it is your hand.

Ha ha ha, amazing appearance of great “thing” is in the picture compared to the actual size. This shows how things can change when it is immortalized.

Your hands are small and delicate. And now without hair, more feminine than ever. Kisses

I just want to add being Josefa’s client,how pleased i am to have her treat me. I used the laurier probe,which i requested as i have sensitive skin.

Josefa was very professional with her work while being treated over the 3 days. She used a new laurier probe each time and her hygiene standards were extremely high.

Its been just over a week since having treatment and im healing very well,some place’s have almost healed. I had uk electrolysis before josefa and my skin took months to heal.

I can not recommend Josefa enough, she was very kind while having treatment and ive also made a new friend :slight_smile:

thanks again and keep up the good work as always.

Espero que disfrute de su descanso merecido

Smurf, Coolshaker, I’m glad we were able to contribute to Josefa’a work with you and I’m pleased you took the time to speak about it. Here in the US the package is the focus. I may just have to look into sterile packaging.

I wonder what the pro’s here would do if we came out with something like that ?

Well I have totally fallen in love with the Laurier, it is so sturdy and a joy to use, and skins reaction is very reduced. As for Josefas’ skill,it is total perfection. Incidently, I had been using a different brand of insulated probe.

I already said this in my sister’s thread but having approximately 2 hours continuous treatment on the upper lip and the next day the skin looking untouched (apart from many less hairs!) is a joy :smiley:

James - Great to hear how you got on :slight_smile:

See! Electrolysis can be performed without all the hoopla of undesireable skin side effects given good equipment and great probes. I will be battered if I don’t include that SKILL is number one. There, I said it.

2 hours continuous treatment on the upper lip, I’m guessing the hairs weren’t established gnarly long timers which would have required high energy?

No. They were the hairs of a 22 year old girl. Does that make it less impressive that there was no swelling or redness the next day and that no scabs formed later?

I cleared a new client’s upper lip of very coarse hairs last week and spent 82 minutes doing so. I did leave a few hairs in the middle because IT WAS 82 MINUTES AFTER ALL. The client is a a trans woman just starting beard removal. She e-mailed me three days later and said all looked great and she a had a few white pustules near the corner of her mouth that disappeared quickly. It is highly possible to get a good skin reaction with good equipment and high quality probes. Oh yal… skill is number one :grin:. In my particular situation, I routinely have a good outcome with the Apilus Platinum using one or a few of the thermolysis modes and years back, when I used the Silhouette Tone VMC using microflash thermolysis, same good outcome.

It doesn’t make it less impressive, of course it doesn’t, but I think it’s important that All of the information is included so that anyone perhaps visiting the forum for the first doesn’t go away with unrealistic expectations. Every client is going to have different needs regarding the amount of energy needed to get the job done and they aren’t all going to walk away without some skin reaction.
Call me a skeptic but these are some of the things I consider when I stick my head up and say “hang on a minute”
With approximately 360 to 600 follicles being Zapped in an hour, sometimes less sometimes more.
An area as delicate as the upper lip.
Where perhaps the follicles are packed together and full of gnarly thick well established terminal hairs.
Where more energy is being used if needed.
Taking into consideration that not everyone will react the same even when identical treatment parameters are used. Some experience swelling, some don’t. Some will experience prolonged erythema, some wont. Some may get pustules some won’t. Some may get small scabs, some won’t so on and son on etc etc.
What could possibly motivate someone to say that All treatments will be fluffy and nice, it isn’t honest and it isn’t right.
I think this kind of information could be one of the reasons you have people bouncing around between practitioners searching for perfect treatment with no reaction, no discomfort and everything happening as though in a Disney film.
I will no doubt be jumped on here for seemingly making excuses for bad treatment, that’s not what I’m doing, not at all.
In the words of Ali G I’m just suggesting that we " Keep it real, I ! "
Of course there are going to be cases where everything goes perfectly, there are also going to be cases where they don’t and there’s nothing to suggest that where they don’t the end result won’t be the same…

You might consider trying a handmade Probe before passing judgement on it’s results follizap… :wink:

I think Caith’s posts demonstrate nicely the improvement in skin reaction and efficacy, when all parameters remain the same except the change of probe.

As Dee has said, electrologist skill, coupled with the right equipment makes a world’s difference.

Just to be clear (this is already all in my sister’s thread), she had both sideburns removed as well. The hair here was obviously much thicker. There was swelling for 2 to 3 days and some (less than 10%) follicles scabbed. The photos in the thread show that by day 11, the scabs were gone and the skin was looking very good. The photos at 2 months show a fraction of the initial hair in the guise of regrowth. It’s now 3.5 months later and there has been no further noticeable growth come through.

Now, she did not have any other needle used with this electrologist. It is useless to compare with her London one, who used a Sterex SX-B, basic magnification and wouldn’t do more than about 20mins on the upper lip because the swelling was too much (we’re talking blend here) and she didn’t want to leave the client with a long healing time. There was a tendency for pustules to form but otherwise the next day, her lip was fine then too. The sideburns with thermolysis would scab in every follicle.

If the electrologist has already decided based on tests with other clients, that this probe produces better results than I trust her. I’m sure even otherwise, the results would have been impressive but striving for further improvement is never a bad thing.

And yes, if I wasn’t satisfied, I would bounce around until I felt I had found someone who is worth spending my hard earned money on. Why should I spend in on less than the best I can find?

I find people just want good, effective treatment without having to stay at home for two weeks until they feel they can face the world. I’ve not met anyone who expects it to be a “Disney film”.

p.s. It’s closer to 800 hairs an hour.

Follizap is not “passing judgment,” just trying to be realistic. I am using Laurier probes too but I would never work 2 hours on an upper lip … well, maybe if my machine was turned off.

Mike, your needles are good, but they do not stop the normal inflammation process (and they shouldn’t). If you have no signs of anything being done the day after treatment (normal redness and edema), then probably nothing was done. The best feature of your needles, and why I use them in certain cases: you can SEE where the insulation is. I love this feature that gives me great control over what I’m doing. (I am only using these with thermolysis because the insulation lasts about 40 minutes using DC-blend.)

I think that is what Follizap is trying to say and I agree with him. There really is no magic to the electrolysis profession: we all want to permanently remove the hair with as little trauma as possible. As Dee points out, the combination of good equipment and skill is the determing factor. Add to this, years of experience and the ability to accurately predict the outcome (in real hours), and that’s what we all try to do.

With the upper lip, we must remember that the blood supply is limited. I always clear off body hair because the skin is attached to blood-rich underlying tissue; not so the upper lip. The upper lip is essentially a flap of skin supplied by an artery on each side. Full clearance with appropriate current might compromise healing. Even when the lip looks perfect immediately after treatment there could be negative results later. Remember the lip and chin areas are densely populated with myofibroblasts; so these areas require careful treatment.

Earlier on, one of our clients on Hairtell said she was noticing “folding” on her lip and she thought it might be from electrolysis. I have seen this as well on people that have had year of electrolysis. Sometimes I have seen vertical creases and sometimes a horizontal ridge that demarks the area where the hairs were located.

Were these people “overtreated” continually? I don’t know; but suspect they were. I only know that I proceed with maximum safety when doing the upper lip, and that also includes not working excessive hours at one time. Dr. Schuster, by the way, states that electrolysis can induce such wrinkling on the upper lip (see his video). He also went into great detail on this subject in his landmark lecture in Los Angeles a few years ago. (He recommends shorter treatment on the upper lip.)

Patients want the hair gone “immediately?” Well, I never allow myself to fall into that trap. I especially get “pushed” by TG folks: they want immediate results. Going slowly, being sure each hair is permanently treated and being cautious is my protocol. Many TG clients do NOT like my approach. However, after completing many beards I have never even come close to 100 hours total. My average is 60 - 70 hours maximum. For underarms, my average is only (maximum) 6 hours.

One thing I admire about the laser folks: they understand the concept of joules, i.e., that a specific amount of thermal energy must be delivered to the follicle to attain results. Indeed, with electrolysis, there is also a minimum amount of energy (in joules) that must be delivered. Sadly, this standard has never been discovered or accurately measured; hence all our non-specific wrangling about “methods.” See, there actually IS a constant: we just have not discovered it and have no way of measurement.

Well, there’s a lot of “grist” here for my beloved colleagues.

Hi Michael - Josefa treated my sister. I can assure you that hair was sorted out. When she’s back you can ask her about the details of why she was happy to clear it for that long.

This has been a very interesting thread, always enjoy reading about about advancements even if they have been around for awhile, unfortunately for myself and other UK electrologists we would not be able to use the Laurier needles, council regulations means all our probes have to be disposable…

I pulled a chart of a trans woman that I treated on August 8th. Her first treatment was on the upper lip only. Time worked was 160 minutes and I,433 insertions were completed using a mixture of PicoFlash and Synchro thermolysis in the 370 el and 417 el range. Timing was set at .050. She was 95% cleared. I told her that she would feel and perhaps look swollen for 1.5 to 3 days. I verbally instructed her on aftercare and gave her written instructions as well. I asked her to e-mail me in four days and let me know about her healing.

She e-mailed me on day two about leaving her earrings in my office and as a by the way, told me that she was back to normal and wanted to set up another appointment in three weeks.

I am very cautious about skin reaction, always observing and trusting my instincts. I honestly can share that I do cases like this weekly and I see people through to the very end. I have several clients that have stopped in occasionally for a few hairs that have popped up over the years, after I have used this strategy " clear the hairs fast in high numbers" strategy. The skin is in great condition. I do it for thin hairs as well on the upper lip and the upper lip skin is clear and untarnished. No wrinkles or pits years later. Nobody has come for my head years later complaining of wrinkles and pits. The only thing I can attribute this to is my equipment, the Apilus Platinum, with the modes I choose to use within the thermolysis program. Before that, I was using the Silhouette Tone VMC using thermolysis, as well. What I am saying again is, it is possible to go longer and strip an area of coarse hair and not have tons of oozing, scabbing, edema, hyperpigmentation that lasts for months and months. Nobody is more surprised than me that this possible. I trusted James when he told me this could be accomplished, and even though I felt uneasy doing this at first, as usual, James was right. Some sources are not updated and maybe they shouldn’t be. Working like this is not for the faint of heart. If people are uncomfortable with this approach, by all means, they should stick to upper lip care that is limited to 20 minutes with their mini-Clareblend or Proteus. No kick in the butt intended, but not all epilators are engineered the same, so this approach is not being encouraged.

Mike, is there anyway you can get your hands on an Apilus Platinum and try this for yourself? I’d be glad to give you guidance or I’m sure James could do the same if you don’t want me involved. I only use Ballet Gold, Ballet Insulated probe, and of course, the fabulous Laurier insulated probe works like a charm. There may be other probes that are just as wonderful, but I haven’t evaluated any other probes to share my observations, to be fair.

“Mike, is there anyway you can get your hands on an Apilus Platinum and try this for yourself.”

I did try and was amazed at the reaction. I called the Dectro school a few weeks ago since I was going to be in the area. I told the owner that I wanted to do a “real” test-drive of the Dectro unit, and also drop by for some support and “good will.”

Sadly, there seems to be a war in California between the two schools: I’m neutral and stay friendly with everybody. The owner of the Dectro school said that “since I know those people, I might be a ‘spy,’ and was therefore FORBIDDEN to enter his school.” I kid you not!

I have never had any problems with this guy and our few encounters have always been excellent. Anyway, he said he would find a practitioner in “my area” so I could look at the unit. So far … nothing!

The silly thing about me being a “spy” is that, well, he knows who I am … so, how could I be a spy?

Years ago we also have this “war” between a school in Modesto and the school in Los Angeles. I went to both and became friends with the “opposing school.” I even lectured at one of their seminars.

(Finally I have learned that when two parties are in a “war” it’s best to stay away; even if your intentions are to get them to stop fighting.)

So, YES, if you know of anyone in my area that would give me the “deal” I’m “all ears!” (You know, my damned 'DUMBO" EARS!)

Be well, and thanks for the invite!