I made no blanket statements about the efficacy of thermolysis originally. All I said was after over 50 treatments in 2.5 yrs, I’ve seen no results so I don’t think it’s effective. That is why I disagree with your statement saying “Both methods, blend and thermolysis, work if performed perfectly well by a trained electrologist. Efficacy cannot be determined after a couple of treatments.”
I tried it long enough with a certified electrologist with almost two decades of experience, who teaches others, and it didn’t work.
There are no scientific studies on these methods and 150 yrs of “that’s the way we think things are” is no substitute. For many years, we thought the world was flat. Science proved otherwise. Frankly, even tested medical procedures that work 99.999% of the time do not work in some cases.
I take umbrage with your statement because it leaves no room for this uncertainty and I do not want other people hitting their head against a wall wondering why this procedure did not work for them. I do not think these boards should be promoting the idea that these procedures are infallible when there are contradicting stories out there.