I have looked on this and many other hair removal forums. Everyone seems to say that the Cutera Coolglide is not a good option for removing the coarse black underarm and leg hair that I am having done (my skin is type I almost certainly, maybe type II, but I am seriously Snow White… Snow White crossed with a wookie)
Why is this exactly? People seem to state it as a fact that everyone should know without reasons…
I ask because I have had two appointments and the progress seems to be as should be expected:
appt 1: hurt quite a bit, fluence setting was 49 (don’t know pulse setting), red and splotchy skin for a few hours and dry/sensitive for a couple of days, hair shed 2-3 weeks later, “no” hair for a couple of weeks (a few here and there were missed; I have very dense hair for a woman), waited a week after hair started coming back in and…
appt 2: just yesterday; 49 seemed to hurt alot more (again, maybe pulse setting was different?), so tech dropped it to 46. Same reactions. Need to wait and see about the shedding obviously, but some singed hair is already “loose”.
QUESTION: what is the reason behind people saying that this laser (or any Nd:YAG) is not good for fair skin/dark hair? I understand the whole melanin absoprtion curve thing, but all this tells me is that if proper settings are used it should still work well as it has such a deep penetration (depth of focus) even if absorption is 10X less.
There very well might be a good reason. Does it result in less permanent hair reduction? Or hurt more than other lasers (which I would believe!). Nobody seems to state reasons, just that fair skinned people should use another laser…
Thanks!