Vector hair removal?

i think its a good thing to ‘thrash out’ these debates in an informed way in the way we are rather than just say it crap or its great thats the balance people need <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

It is quite another to spend $200 or more on something that is less than one could get by spending the same money elsewhere

although people waste money all the time why do people buy lottery tickets when they have more chance of being stuck by lightening than winning the jackpot and they have nothing to show for it :\

people can buy all sorts of things that are over priced what about prada shoes for example <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

when there are perfectly good shoes about that would probably last longer and would be better value.

no my only opinion is that the vector is readily available its ‘accessible’ to the home user and as far as i am concerned its sole failing and fault was the tweezers claims

but then thats got a work around now <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

and after all an apilus sm-500 + needles is not exactly pocket money you get very little change out of 1,500 a bit less if you are lucky but a mint one is 15 hundred bucks that is way out of the reach for most people starting out

and then you have to add the postage to that probably another $100 international then a step down transformer if its a US one another £35 its an expensive business all this most people just wanna buy something new that will work and be left alone to get one with it really :stuck_out_tongue:

<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> :\

It would be rare to find an SM-500 for less than $1,000US, however, Instantrons, Clarablends, Fischers, and Gentronics are frequently available in that range.

I will agree with you about the Prada thing, but since I have a mental block on that kind of financial behavior, I guess it never occured to me. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif" alt="" />