On 26 December 2002, I received the following note:
</font><blockquote><font size=“1” face=“Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif”>quote:</font><hr /><font size=“2” face=“Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif”> 12/26/02
Dear Andrea,
We want to thank you for the honesty and usefulness of your web site. We
believe you are providing a great service to the consumer and would like to
update our product information and facts to continue being part of your
service. Esba Laboratories Inc (previously DermaScan), produces „Topicaine‰,
a clear, translucent long-lasting anesthetic gel. Below find brief
description of our product and results of a study that we believe will be of
great interest.
TOPICAINE contains Lidocaine base 4% (not the chlorhydrate) and the skin is
more permeable to the base form than to the salt form. The base form is
lipophilic (lipid soluble) and the stratum corneum is more permeable to
those, than to hydrosoluble (water soluble) substances such as salts. This
lidocaine is formulated in a drug delivery system formed by MICROVESICLES.
This are lipid micelles, like liposomes, that have great affinity with the
stratum corneum lipids. But THEY ARE MUCH SMALLER THAN LIPOSOMES, so they go
in quicker and deeper. Not only that but the lidocaine is also delivered
from the continuous phase of the gel (a SOLVENT SYSTEM consisting of
ethanol-glycerin-water) where the lidocaine is highly concentrated and that
makes it immediately available to the skin. The gel also contains skin
PERMEATION ENHANCERS (“PEs”: these are safe substances that temporarily and
reversibly increase the permeability of the stratum corneum—so the drug
can penetrate easier)
FAST AND EFFECTIVE-COMPARISON WITH OTHER PRODUCTS
A totally independent study (not funded by ESBA in any way) by the
Dermatology department of New York University , the group of Drs. Friedman,
Fogelman, Levine and Ashinoff, found it to be an effective anesthetic after
30 min of application. It worked better than EMLA and Ela-Max 5 which were
also included in this study.
This study was presented by Dr Paul Friedman at the American Society of
Laser Surgery and Medicine, in Reno, NV on 4/17/00. An interview to Dr
Friedman was published in the July 2000 issue of Cosmetic Surgery Times. Dr
Fogelman, presented this study too at another meeting, and Cosmetic Surgery
Times published an interview with him on April 2001.
The study that compared the efficacy of our product, Topicaine Gel
(lidocaine base 4% in gel with microsomes and permeation enhancers), with
Ela-Max 5 (which contains 5% lidocaine chlorhydrate in liposomes) and
EMLA(which contains 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine) in a double-blind,
placebo-controlled fashion.
The 3 anesthetics and a placebo were applied (randomly) to the volar antearm
of 24 volunteers, for 30 minutes, under occlusion. After the 30-min
application time, the volunteers were tested for pain by the application of
a laser as painful stimuli. The pain scores were also taken 15 minutes after
that, and 30 minutes after that.
The results were as follows (the quotes are from Dr Friedman‚s presentation,
on tape):
-
At the 30 minute (post-application time), just after removing the
anesthetics: “Topicaine and Ela-Max-5 were statistically superior to
control” . -
In the following time point, 15 minutes after the removal (45 minutes
post-application): “Fifteen minutes after removal, Topicaine was the
superior anesthetic alone” -
In the following time point, 30 minutes after removal (60 minutes post
application, or 30 minute after the 30 minute application point): “we found
that Topicaine and EMLA were statistically superior to Ela-Max 5”.
Topicaine was at the top of efficacy, clearly in timepoints 2 and 3. In
point one, both Topicaine and Ela-Max were statistically superior to
control. So if you look at these results, you can see that Topicaine was the
anesthetic that performed with the best efficacy overall.
This same group had done a similar study one year before, comparing 4
topical anesthetics (not Topicaine) and found EMLA and ELA-MAX 4% superior
to EUTECTIC LA ( now called Betacaine) and to Tetracaine gel; so a corollary
could be that Topicaine is better than all those others too (even though the
evidence is indirect). This study was published in Dermatologic Surgery,
1999.
Topicaine is available in 4 different sizes:
–Unitdose 1 gram tube (12 in a package). Total: 12 grams. Each provides 1
application to the lip plus chin areas. $19.99*
–10 gram tube (twice as much product as our competitor‚s for less. Provides
approx. 4-5 applications to the full face. $15.99*
–30 gram tube (1 OZ). Provides approx. 4-5 applications to the bikini or
underarm areas; 3 applications to the full face. $39.99*
–113 gram tube (4 OZ). Fro treatments on the back, legs or any large area.
It is the most cost effective. $79.99*
- Above prices are for individuals, but we also have special prices for
Professionals, including discounts of about 40% when purchasing by the box
(12 and 6 tubes depending on the size)
Let us know if you have any further comments or questions about the
qualities of Topicaine. The current link to our web site is
www.esbalabs.com. We can also be reach at 650-965-0665/0208, 650-969-8310
and by email at esba@esbalabs.com
Thanks in advance for your consideration.
Yours truly,
Maria Eugenia Tuttle
Customer Service Representative
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size=“2” face=“Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif”>For detail, please see:
http://www.hairfacts.com/tips/pain/topicaine.html
or visit their site at: