Actually, I’m too lazy to read all my own “stuff.” I’m not sifting through my own “crap.” Good grief I can be so “wordy.” When will I ever be able to say anything succinctly?
I think I was making the point of defining a chest pattern? Laser, in my experience, is not good at this; electrolysis is better.
We are all, of course, influenced by our experiences (actually observation is not a very good reference point; I concede that). Remember, that virtually all the clients I see (since the advent of laser in 1995) have had failed laser treatments: that’s why they sought me out. Still, I fully understand that I cannot make any conclusion based on this “blind-sided” observation.
An earlier post I made about “the marketplace” is really the only one that I’ve made that has any validity. I will, as Sheff points out, be more careful in how the “public might read my comments.” Still, sparring or inflicting “barbs” will have no impact on what the marketplace decides it WANTS (for hair removal).
I think the reason that laser “succeeded” is because electrolysis did NOT “deliver.” I think the reason that electrolysis is “succeeding” (again) is because laser is not “delivering.” By this I mean, what the public actually WANTS: fast, inexpensive and painless with a guarantee of results. Both systems fall far short of this eventual goal.
I don’t like laser or electrolysis!