Sorry to start a new thread, but I’ve been lurking here for over a year and I’m starting to realize that I may need answers that are catered to me a bit more specifically than the generic ones I browse for.
I’ve always been wary of lasers because they aren’t necessarily a great solution. I would prefer electrolysis, but would never finish in my lifetime (super coarse, dense hair over my entire body). Seriously, it would take a million years and way too much money to proceed with electrolysis. So I want to try lasers because they seem to be a faster method for many of the areas I need help with. Is that an accurate assumption?
I suppose I’d go with an alexandrite laser. I’m very very pale (type I skin in most areas I’m guessing), and my hair is primarily black or very dark brown. I should be a perfect candidate. I’m thinking of doing my lower legs for some sessions, and then electrolysis for any regrowth. At that point, would it just be simpler to invest in electrolysis from the get-go? Would someone with my coloring even bother with electrolysis when I’m such a perfect candidate for laser?
I have no money, and will have to pick my course of action wisely. I don’t want to waste money on electrolysis if laser would be 90% effective on me, but I don’t want to waste money on laser if it’s as unreliable as I hear. Even a 60-70% reduction would be worth it I think if the reduction was permanent. So you laser gurus, do you think it’s worth pursuing over electrolysis based on the sheer amount of hair and my personal coloring?