Back to the ‘bible’ page 7: Hinkel asks that same question as to whether or not ‘the electrologist’s needle itself might be the stimulus of new growths of hair’.
He explains that ‘almost every instance of accelerated growth has been the result of a sustained source of irritation. Nothing of such MINOR INTENSITY or of so SHORT DURATION as the electrical action of the electrologist’s needle could alter the permanent cutaneous (skin) blood supply sufficiently to cause a marked increase in hair growth. Since the incidence of increased growth following treatment is rare, it is quite probable that the increase is due in those unusual instances to a coincidental change in the hormonal balance’.
When the skin is rubbed, chafed, burned or consistently irritated, nature provides protection to that area of skin by growing hair. Whenever there is irritation, the blood supply increases to that area (close to the skin’s surface) and causes hair to grow deeper and darker. For example, my son had a cast on his arm for a couple months following a football injury. When the cast was removed, his arm looked like a little monkey’s arm - lots and lots of dark hair. Thankfully, the hair disappeared shortly after the source of irritation (the cast) was removed.
If someone is using Nair every other day, I guess that could be classified as an irritant and thus could increase the blood supply to the area causing increased hair growth. Hadn’t reasoned that one out before??? You ask good questions, Mina.
Dee