We can always count on Brenton to defend the laser industry … after all, he did get good results and that counts for something; besides he’s on a sacred mission. Yes, we know you had great results and that’s great! It really is. But one has to go well beyond one (or a few) successful outcome(s) and weigh as much hard evidence, and risks, as possible. I’m talking about (since I’m often misunderstood) the final result the client wants; not that it “works or does not work!”
All electrologists I know offer a guarantee of the final result, if you want written it can be done. However, a spoken guarantee is just as good (legally) as a written one.
Can any laser operator give any promise of precisely 70% reduction? Maybe 25%, or 50% reduction? You know, the exact outcome that the client wants? I don’t think so, and THAT was the issue. The issue was not that it “worked great on Brenton!” Yes, we DO know and have heard about your successes many times indeed … and that’s terrific. Bravo! But your one dividual success does not invalidate what I’ve said (and you DO try to accomplish this all the time! It’s that holy mission stuff. Not working!)
What if the guy wanted 50% reduction, and got 100% reduction? Now what? With electrolysis he might discover he actually wanted less than, or more than a 70% reduction … See, we remove it slowly and create the exact outcome the client wants.
Of course the OP can “trust” the outcome of Brenton, or perhaps the mountains of documented photographic evidence of “patchy” laser work … especially BEARD work gone bad, that is truly disfiguring. I suppose it’s everyone’s own decision based on what he or she wants to believe and whom they trust. (I had good results from laser too … that’s not the issue!)
Seana, you live in a bit of a bubble in that “Great White North.” You have no idea what’s going on “down here.” The AMA study was, for example, on 50,000 men! It’s a significant number and certainly enough to issue a warning; which they have done. My comments were not directed at the TG community whatsoever … I mean not at all; not even on my “radar.” I understand this legitimate usage.
I don’t mind being “called out” on something. But I dislike it when the admonishment is based on misunderstanding. Then, I’m on the damned ceiling again.
I suppose we all have our own private bubble of sorts. Sometimes they “burst” on us when we least expect it! I even blow-up my own bubbles now and then. It’s fun!