Over a year later (and full regrowth?)

Oh, I had to laugh when I read Harvey’s post. Yep, that’s Harvey; not too shy about self-promotion. The first time I met him he basically said, “Hi, I’m a member of 'Mensa” and I’m a lot smarter than you." I just listened …

Oh, but that’s not as bad as a woman from Pennsylvania (I think her name was “Kaye”) … After listening to her speech, I introduced myself and said she did a great job. She said … almost word-for-word, “Oh, you’re from California? You don’t know anything … you’re all a bunch of CLOWNS ‘out there’!” I just listened …

(East Coast!)

Yes, I am also of those who think that to listen -especially when those speaking do so from their pedestal- is always more interesting, more fun, and more rewarding than to be the one speaking. You can always learn something if you are able to maintain alert through what can sometimes be verbal incontinence.

Personally, I think that an important feature of intelligence is to be able to summarize, to say a lot in a few words. Michael you could teach a little of this to Mr. Grove.

I have thought about opening a new thread to discuss ULTRA-lysis and to present the method that Adrien and I are following.
We have simplified the founder’s method a bit, but I don’t think this really impacts on the results too much. I am really interested to know your opinion on the matter. I think Mr. Grove’s idea deserves a try, or at least deserves a discussion based on proven facts rather than on mere assumptions. What do you say?

I think that the one missing aspect might be seeing if the hair “slides out.” If you don’t remove the hair, how would you know if it’s “cooked” correctly.

Now, where did I leave my “clown feet?”

“Ultra-lysis” … I don’t think that measures up to having a “patent” on the method. “Trade name” sure, of course; you can get a trade name on anything … but not a patent. There would be nothing to stop anyone from using the Harvey method.

Likewise the much-touted “S.I.M.P.L.E.” trade name deal (?) … I think that’s Susanne Anderer’s baby(?) … is just the “up-down” thing that everybody does … nothing to “patent” here.

Then there is a “lovely” in Canada who claims she has her machines “completely re-engineered” for her totally “exclusive” method … for which, for a tiny $25,000 she will teach you. I talked to the manufacturer and the machine is not altered in any way. Just BS! To which I will add WTF!

And, of course the “Lucy Peters” secret method (not so secret any more) …

All of this is what I call the “Madamme Boom Boom Electrolysis Salon” myths, secrets, and mysteries show. Nonsense!

My answer: just show and tell everything … and that is what the AEA should be all about … and they ARE. Hurray!! (sort of.)

Nicely, that “goofy; my exclusive method” page HAS been turned … all thanks to the INTERNET … AND HAIRTELL SPECIFICALLY! I have hated this field for decades and now, finally, I love it … well, LOVE the open people like you Jossie …

As they say, a rising tide lifts all boats … it’s the future AND the well-being of our patients.

BRAVO!

I have 2 new videos ready to go … Waiting for Eric to get his butt back from Texas to complete the technical junk. I still can’t listen to it … my horrible VOICE (makes me sick).

Oh, I’m making my first “personal appearance” on this new video … I can’t believe how FAT I got … time to “hit the gym.” FAT FAT FAT! I’m beginning to look like a real electrologist!

(Don’t expect any PC from me … tee hee.)

Reading that thread was bit of memory lane. Saw some people taking part I read from 10 years ago( I may have even met offbroadway I dont remember ) One really unfortunate part of growing old, is the memory does tend to fade, but all it takes is a few cues for it all to come back. I think I’ll let the experts evaluate the method though, it doesnt seem to be quite up my alley.

hah, scratch that, I now remember where I know that name from.

Seana