[quote]Ohio is not that conservative politically. Bush barely won there BTW, and that may be more due to the weakness of the other candidate. I live in a far more conservative area and have never had a problem. I think that Josh’s concerns/problems are due specifically to the idiots that he works with. They sound like ignorant rednecks and he must deal with that in whatever way he thinks best. And BTW rednecks are not necessarily conservative. Rudeness knows no political boundaries.
Part of the reason he quit shaving was that he didn’t like being hairless, and that is reason enough for him.
RJC2001
OK, I’m sorry I ever started this. I give. OK. Given where Josh works, he probably isn’t dealing with the cream of the crop, but it’s a summer job, and I think the whole thing was making him uncomfortable, and I don’t think he was in love with shaving anyhow, so the combination led him to conclude his legs are better off in their natural state, and that is fine with me. I think unless you really prefer your legs smooth, there is no pressure to shave, quite the opposite in fact, so far, for men. If you like your legs shaved I would hope that most people would leave you alone, but there are going to be sub-populations, “red neck” or otherwise, who will give you a hard time. If you care, its worth the fight. If you don’t, just going with the hairy legged majority is far easier. All that said, the odds of someone objecting are FAR lower in, say, Los Angeles, than in Canton, OHIO. If you remember back to the 1960’s, and all the dad’s that got so upset about their son’s “long hair”. They were not tolerant of change, or of differences, and that same group are not going to be tolerant of men shaving their legs, it’s just that simple. The percentage of people with that sort of outlook are greater in more rural, more “blue collar” midwest and southern locations; but they exist in blue collar communities in New Jersey as well, so I’m not picking on geographical locations per se. I hope we can let poor Josh’s problems go now. [/quote]
No need to apologize. In different areas of the country, shaved legs may be more or less acceptable. Why? We may never know all the reasons and there may be different reasons. Maybe some are afraid that shaving legs may become more acceptable or even the norm. If their wives and girlfriends want them to shave, they won’t be happy because their daily grooming regimen just got longer! Maybe some have a deep rooted fear that they might be gay, so they lash out at others as a defense mechanism. This is all speculation, but it would not surprise me if these were some of the reasons.
And some things defy explanation. My dog’s vet is very conservative, yet when his daughter wanted her navel pierced, he said, “I’ll do it so it’s done right and you don’t get an infection.” So she is sporting a navel ring which looks very nice on her. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> More than a few people with pierced eyebrows, noses, and tongues, but nobody seems to really care or be bothered by it. It is far from mainstream, yet those who are pierced are rarely hassled.
RJC2001