Lasering Forearms (Male)

I currently have black hair on my forearms that grows in densely (a lot of hair per square inch) and thickly (hair thickness).

I would like to reduce the density and thickness of the hair on my forearms without removing all of the hair permanently (I do not want to be all bare on my forearms, as I want to preserve my masculinity)

Is it realistic for laser to achieve this result with a natural look? – the last thing I want is patchiness. I just want the hair to grow in thinner and less of it per square inch.

Please share your stories if you have tried to achieve this or have thoughts to contribute.

Thanks

For what it’s worth … my recommendation:

With laser, it might actually be too successful and not give you the look you want.

By contrast, electrolysis can give you the precise/exact look you want. With a lot of guys, I will spend, say, 1 - 2 hours thinning one arm. To make it easier for me, I will zap only the hairs in anagen stage (this gives me a very easy way to thin the area without too much thought). There is NO need to shave (and you should NOT), because we can easily identify anagen hairs by looking at the “virgin growth.”

Then, leave it alone for a couple months. If you like this look, you are finished. If not, you can go ahead and do a little thinning and follow the same strategy.

I have worked with two guys that did laser on their forearms. It worked well on the top (coarse hairs), but not on the finer hairs below. So, I had to remove these fine hairs and try to make the thing look “normal.” I got it looking better, but, actually, not very “natural” looking … sorry to say. Both had a streak of bare skin right down the middle!

I would do a single laser treatment and give it ~6 months and see how it looks. Shouldn’t be patchy or anything drastically bad after one time.

I’ve done many sessions with laser on my forearms and had a big reduction, it looks natural, only reason it wouldn’t would be if they consistently miss areas. You’ll never get 100% reduction with laser anyway, it only works on the very darkest coarsest hairs. I’ve had probably 8-10 sessions on my forearms (probably 6 or so with an alex at really high settings, then the last 4 was with a package I had got with Soprano XL that included arms so just did them anyway). Seemed like it got to a point after the alex and then never changed, so I’d say I had maybe a 50% reduction or so. Was planning on doing electrolysis eventually once I find a good place that doesn’t waste time, as so many have no idea what they are doing and it’s a large area to treat.

Odi: Did you get it done? If so, could you please share pics?

Thanks

If it were me, I’d listen to Michael.

If you really want to go for Laser, as odi has suggested, one or maximum two treatments should do it but it’s difficult to predict.

My sister’s arms:
Two Laser treatments on forearms.
[Pre treatment, 8 weeks post 2nd treatment, 15 weeks post 2nd treatment (mid Jan 2011)]
The extra sparse area is the initial test patch spot.

This is how it looked in June 2011. The dots are where she had an electrolysis test patch. As you can see, the hair has filled in compared to the 15 week post treatment photo. This is why we tell people that they really need to wait at least 6 months to see how effective their treatment has been.
9 months after two Laser treatments on forearms.

Her lower arms and hands are now hair free from two electrolysis clearances :D. There is a photo in her diary (linked in my sig).

It is, as they say, somewhat of an “oxymoron” (oh gosh I used THAT word again … he he he). All men want “the thing” over with as FAST as possible (male thinking), and so usually pick laser over electrolysis. But, is it REALLY faster? Not so fast “buster!”

From start-to-finish, my “back cases” (Jossie’s too … and most of us here) have the “elapsed time” of about 9 - 10 months. Getting successful laser can take repeated treatments over several years (and then, no guarantee). Sure, you get “the big fast ZAP” at the outset … but nobody is considering total “elapsed time.”

Then, getting the “right thinned look?” I’m somewhat hesitant to ask my “kid from Oregon” to allow me to photograph his beard … but it would illustrated a point. He WANTED a somewhat thinned beard (not removed). What he ended up with is a PATCHY look.

He said that during his long “laser ordeal” with the patchy inflammation on his face, etc., his friends often asked (actually) if he had “skin cancer” or some other malady. He had some difficulty at work, since he was “serving food to the public.” It still looks “wrong” … even after two years later of no laser treatment. (I hope he doesn’t read this, but to me it still looks like he “has something.”)

Of course, patients can do whatever they want. However, you HAVE been warned!

(This guy is a “happy-go-lucky-camper” and has no interest in pursuing a lawsuit. And yes, the University returned most of his money. However, he DOES have “cause.” Laser caused a major disruption in his life (quit school), and he was left with a “diseased look.” All of this will be “fixed” but I think he should be compensated!)

And … another thing! Electrolysis can ADJUST the strategy to fit your lifestyle!

My colleague from Australia (I’m sorry I’ve forgotten just who), talked about her “Beach-Ready Strategy” … this is brilliant.

In good old “down-under Ozz,” people are super-athletic and live outside (like folks in California)! With her athletic guys, she can THIN, say, the back and he looks “untouched” in a day or two … “ready for the beach.” She can repeat this strategy and eventually the whole job is exactly as the patient wants it.

This way, he’s never looking “BARE and then hair” … yuck! How do you explain that?

I apologize for not saying something earlier about this excellent “Ozz strategy” … but, well, there it is!

I think that was Christine OConnell Michael.

I didn’t do it on myself, i own a place that does laser which is why i said what i thought.

Another thing that is hard to predict with laser, even in the forearms, you may have spots where the hair will react differently to the laser, for example, hair on the back of the hand might see less reduction than hair near the elbow.
That is why i think, if you want to try laser, take a before photo, do 1 session, wait 6 months and compare with your before photo.

I would say normal hair growth is also patchy. The hair is just typically longer, so it’s not as noticeable, or it’s very dense.

Either way, you can get treatments with a Yag on lower settings that will only target the coarsest growth. After 1 treatment, you can reassess.

I wouldnt do laser on forearm for men! I did it 3.5 month ago and its very patchy now. It may or may not get better. kind of ruining my life now.

I have seen many odd results on arms as described above, as well as induced growth. In my opinion this is a risky area for LHR.

These are my arms:

Before: http://oi44.tinypic.com/9ih3wi.jpg
After Pic 1: http://oi42.tinypic.com/f0ahlc.jpg
After Pic 2: http://oi40.tinypic.com/uojuv.jpg

I’m happy

That is great, totally unlike what I usually see.

Brenton, your photos are pretty much my Laser forearm results after 5 sessions.

For me, the density of the stronger hairs (my hairs are black) was too low for it to look good/natural. I’d shave them regularly until I started electrolysis to finish. Also, it took some time to observe this but I don’t think most of the follicles were destroyed, the follicles were just miniaturised because I have loads of fine and tiny hairs.

Thanks for all of the input everyone. It sounds like there are mixed reviews about using laser to reduce hair density/thickness. Hearing the feedback is very helpful in assessing which approach to take.

While some think 1 or 2 treatments spaced approx. 6 months apart would be effective, others think that electrolysis would be the best method. What if I went to a highly recommend laser hair removal technician - would that change some thoughts?

In terms of results, I think Brenton’s results are too light for what I am looking for because his forearm hair is very sparse and
is also very short. I would like my forearm hair to be a bit more dense and longer that what Brenton has.

When you get electrolysis, wouldn’t the technician need me to shave my forearms so that all of the hair doesn’t get in the way of one another?

What electrolysis method would be best for my goals - blend?

How many sessions / how long per session would I approximately need?

Despite all of the input, I am still a bit confused as to the method I should use since I heard varying pluses and minuses for both methods.

Electrolysis removes one hair at a time. No need to shave anything. No one can tell you how many treatments or hours of treatment are needed since we have no idea how many hairs you have per square inch, how many your electrologist removes per minute, what phase of growth the hairs being treated are in, etc. What we can tell you is that thermolysis is the fastest method, so no need to do any other unless you can’t find a good electrologist who does thermolysis/flash.

Either way, there is no black and white answer here on whether to start with laser or not. There are nuances to each method and only you can determine what you are ok trying out.

hi Brenton, how many weeks after treatment did you take those pictures? Looks like the first treatment knocked off 90% of the hair?

Hmmmm that’s a good questions as I took that picture I think 6 months ago, so I don’t remember to be honest. It was awhile after my treatment, but the exact amount of time, I can’t remember haha. I should point out that the picture was after 4 or 5 treatments. The hairs are bit longer now, and I think the lighting makes it appear a little less dense than what it actually is