I know, same old question…but I still haven’t made my mind up.
After reading through comments on here I was almost convinced to stop the IPL treatments and start actual laser hair removal. But seeing that my skin responded so well, I thought I’ll try another shot of IPL. In the worst case, it just won’t work. At least till now my skin seems to be taking it perfectly. I’ve also had a huge reduction in hair since my first session (at least 80%). Anyway, I had my second IPL session on Saturday and I asked the doctor again if laser isn’t a better option (told her everything I read on here as well). Anyway, she told me that laser targets deeper seated hair ( > 5mm) and IPL focusses on more superficial hair (3-5mm). In my case, she believes that IPL would get more hair than laser and is less risky as well.
She also said, that once the hair has fallen out, it means that the follicle is permanently damaged and won’t sprout new hair. I was worried because many posters wrote that their hair disappeared for about 6 months - 2 years and then started growing again since IPL only damaged the follicle rather than destroying it. She said that new follicles may be generated any time, resulting in increase hair growth but once a follicle is damaged it won’t suddenly start growing hair again after 6 months, be it with IPL or laser.
Their clinic offers both IPL and Nd YAG laser and the treatment cost is the same, so I think she really believes that IPL is better suited for me.
Anyway, as far as I remember, these were the settings: 26J (previously, it was 25), skin relaxation time (???) was 100 and she used 3 pulses (???). I asked about the spot size but she didn’t understand it, which was a bit worrying, but maybe it’s not appropriate for IPL?
Anyway, hope I’m not annoying anyone by asking this question again but I’d love to hear your opinions.