I have a need to also vocalize myself on this thread. As someone that has had professional blend and flash, and has performed blend and flash on myself, me, personally, I’m of the conviction that flash is by far better. For fun, my electrologist did some flash, then blend, to compare speeds on a certain patch of hairs. The biggest thing that struck me was the pain-to-clearing ratio; more gets done with less pain. And for the advocates of blend being the way to go, they seem to weigh the two with flash being represented by only one blip of power at the bottom, then maybe one near the bulge. If an operator hits three times descending, it only takes a half second longer per hair and greatly increases the killing efficiency. I personally have successfully cleared tons of hair like this, whereas blend I would’ve maybe only done a fourth as much, and gave my tweezer hand an unnecessary workout. Sure, in some cases a hair had to be hit twice when it regrew, but still even with that, the time/pain payoff is superior.
Of course, here on this board, I’m singing to the choir. Well-trained electrologist and ‘advanced rogue operators’ equiped with good machines know too well of pulling out hair after hair with nice, fatty sheaths and lumpy bits at the base within a second or two of each other. To a decent flash operator, blend is like taking the backroads and hitting red light after red light instead of being on the super-expressway.
As for the Platinum being less painful than the Senior I or II, hmmm, at this level I think the operator makes the most difference. If an inaccurate insertion is made, or if a hair is slightly out of ideal anagen distance/phase, then that short, narrow killing zone is wasted, and the client will have to feel the pain all over again. …Or am I misunderstanding this in that the Platinum kills the same cell area/target mass, but does it so fast that the nerves can’t react fully? I don’t know, but what I am more interested in is not speed of picoflash delivery, but what it is that’s being delivered. The newer, lower RF frequencies; how do they present a wall of heat travelling through tissue? Dectro has obviously done research on this. I would just like to know, does the newer frequency deliver a more ‘opaque’, defined, sudden wall of death, with no baking sensation that would cause pain? Instead of having a kind of heated, but not dead yet, leading-edge zone to the perimeter of the target death area? Now that I could see as greatly adding to comfort.
Mantaray