You’re still treating facial hair on a woman that already got induced growth from treatments? That’s inconceivable to me. It doesn’t matter that it was with an IPL. As we already tried to explain to you, the concept of how the hair is killed is the SAME in both IPLs and true lasers. If her hair wasn’t coarse enough for IPL treatments, it’s not coarse enough for the Soprano. Period.
You’re wasting this poor woman’s time and money instead of doing the educated thing and telling her to seek electrolysis on this area. There is no “crossing fingers” that needs to be done with LHR. You need to go to conferences and educate yourself on it, i.e. how it works, what the side effects are, and why they come about. You’re not using the best machine out there (it’s ok, but there are better ones - and please don’t try to say otherwise since you can’t know any different at this point as you’ve only been using the machine for 6 months as you’ve told us) and you’re doing this woman a disservice.
Let’s hope she doesn’t come to this forum to complain in a few months after she’s given you several thousand dollars without seeing much of anything. How exactly are you judging this “big improvement”? You can’t tell for sure whether there is any differece until she stops treatments for at least 5-6 months. So far you’ve told us you treat clients every 4-6 weeks and they don’t see shedding. She may as well be shaving if that’s all she can tell at this point.
What happens if (or when) she stops and all hair returns, induced and otherwise? Do you plan to give her her money back?
Btw, this type of thinking by providers is why I stick around on this forum. I’m not sure what’s worse, calculated disservice or disservice under the assumption that one is helping (since the latter tends to take longer to recognize and thus wastes more time and money ont he part of the consumer).