You know how hair has to be treated several times (2-3, maybe more) before it’s completely killed? (wait, is this right?)
Well, what if you treated the area over the years with IPL and laser, and have been taking spirolactone?
I had my full legs done (well almost, I didn’t have the sides done of my upper legs) with a really good laser and a really good practitioner.
However, it was only once but it did really change the hairs (in different ways) the color, texture, size, length, etc… of most of the hairs.
Now I want to get electrolysis done because I don’t think laser will get the job done for me at this point. Plus it left me with tons of ingrowns with really extremely thin coils of hair trapped within the pink bumps.
Does the excellent laser treatment count as 1 of the several times the hair has to be treated to be killed? Especially if it was really good and really changed the consistency of the hair to be weaker and thinner?
Does the thin, coiled ingrown hairs mean only 1 treatment is required now to permanently get rid of them?
I’m also on Spiro, does this also count for a shorter treatment time?
Is it kind of like a point system in which every attempt to weaken the hair follicle makes for a shorter amount of hair killing permanency with electrolysis?
Like 1 awesome laser treatment done this year + 2 years of spiro + 5 years of on and off again barely okay IPL/laser sessions = hair follicles on the legs killed by 1 treatment of very good electrolysis
I’m concerned about every where, but I’m especially interested in the legs!
If someone can answer all of these questions I’d be really, really happy!