I recently had my first ever LHR treatment (brazilian bikini) at a clinic using the cynosure elite, and have had mixed results. I’m female, fair skin that burns easily (a burn might fade to a light tan, but mostly burn - type IIish) with coarse, dark hair in the area. My treatment was 3.5 weeks ago, and I have paid for a 6 treatment package.
In the bikini line/mons area, where the skin is extremely white, they used the 755nm wavelength, and in those areas, pretty much everything has shed. Underneath/on the labia, where there is a bit more pigment in the skin, they used the 1064nm wavelength. In these areas, the hair seems to be growing as normal: it has not shed, has grown considerably, and is firmly rooted. I am waiting on the clinic for the other settings they used, but after contacting them about my results, I was told:
“On 755 nm with this particular machine you will see the hair follicle ablate away immediately which is a more noticeable change .On the 1064 we see less growth over a couple of cycles. With this being said it usually takes a few treatments to see a change however the growth cycle will be undermined and the hair will be reduced. Therefore the 2 technologies are different (and the way you will respond to them)”
Can anyone tell me if I am right to expect shedding of any area that was treated at appropriate settings? I am skeptical of the explanation that the growth cycle has been undermined, given it continued as usual in anagen.
Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated!