Ok, I do not need a clinical trial to be certain that when I add galvanic to the thermolysis my needle produces hydrogen bubbles that sometimes overflow the follicle, which logically, could never happen when we work only with thermolysis.
Therefore, when we use blend, the galvanic plays its role, or otherwise we would not be seeing bubbles. Do not you think?
I also do not need a clinical trial to deduce that if one year after carrying out a full clearance in an untouched area (80% telogen), the percentage of regrowth is between 10-20% meaning that most of the telogen hairs were destroyed.
However, you are right in one thing, consumers are not stupid, many of those who participate here have had the opportunity to verify for themselves that telogen is as effective as anagen regardless of the modality used. You can continue to deny the facts, and thus insult the intelligence of consumers and thousands of electrologists around the world, but that will not make you right.