I don’t understand the following sentence:
“But, essentially no cataphoresis is illegal because it can be used to administer drugs and it’s not any more legal to cross a land border with either.”
I think it’s saying that “cataphoresis is illegal in the United States?” I’ve yet to see authoritative evidence to corroborate this “assertion.” (But have heard this voiced, both here and in Europe … mostly Germany.)
Can anyone direct me to such a “new” written regulation? Most interesting. Perhaps Dectro has written about this?